Friday, July 17, 2026
The Lutheran priest and author Nadia Bolz-Weber questions how we might follow the Beatitudes:
It can be easy to view the Beatitudes … as Jesus’s command for us to try real hard to be meeker, poorer, and mourn-ier in order that we might be blessed in the eyes of God…. But what if the Beatitudes aren’t about a list of conditions we should try to meet to be blessed? What if they are not virtues we should aspire to?… Maybe the Sermon on the Mount is all about Jesus’s lavish blessing of the people around him on that hillside … who that world—like ours—didn’t seem to have much time for: people in pain, people who work for peace instead of profit, people who exercise mercy instead of vengeance.
Maybe Jesus was simply blessing the ones around him that day who didn’t otherwise receive blessing, who had come to believe that, for them, blessings would never be in the cards…. Doesn’t that just sound like something Jesus would do?
Bolz-Weber offers her own version of beatitudes for people who may not feel blessed today:
Blessed are the poor in spirit. You are of heaven and Jesus blesses you.
Blessed are they for whom death is not an abstraction.
Blessed are they who have buried their loved ones, for whom tears could fill an ocean.
Blessed are they who have loved enough to know what loss feels like.
Blessed are the mothers of the miscarried.
Blessed are they who don’t have the luxury of taking things for granted anymore.
Blessed are they who can’t fall apart because they have to keep it together for everyone else.
Blessed are the motherless, the alone, the ones from whom so much has been taken….
Blessed are those who no one else notices. The kids who sit alone at middle-school lunch tables. The laundry guys at the hospital. The sex workers and the night-shift street sweepers.
Blessed are the losers and the babies and the parts of ourselves that are so small, the parts of ourselves that don’t want to make eye contact with a world that loves only the winners.
Blessed are the forgotten.
Blessed are the closeted.
Blessed are the unemployed, the unimpressive, the underrepresented….
I imagine Jesus standing there blessing us all because I believe that is our Lord’s nature. Because, after all, it was Jesus who had all the powers of the universe at his disposal but did not consider his equality with God something to be exploited. Instead, he came to us in the most vulnerable of ways, as a powerless, flesh-and-blood newborn. As if to say, “You may hate your bodies, but I am blessing all human flesh. You may admire strength and might, but I am blessing all human weakness. You may seek power, but I am blessing all human vulnerability.”… [Jesus] was God’s Beatitude—God’s blessing to the weak in a world that admires only the strong.
Reference:
Nadia Bolz Weber, Accidental Saints: Finding God in All the Wrong People (Convergent Books, 2015), 184, 185–186, 188.
John Chaffee – Five On Friday
1.
“Seek freedom and become captive of your desires. Seek discipline and find your liberty.”
– Frank Herbert, Author of the Dune Series
Currently, I am reading the first Dune book. I have attempted to read it before, but it did not stick.
This time around, though, it is, and I am rather enjoying it.
One thing that stands out to me is the interplay among social, religious, and technological commentary. Apparently, Herbert was quite interested in desert mysticism, and that means Dune is suffused with many of those themes and values.
So far, the heroes of the story are disciplined and principled. Their lives make sense, and they are honorable in the eyes of others. This is so much the case that one political enemy actually wishes his daughter would marry the said political enemy!
It is very true, though, that in the desert monastic tradition, they held that if you are constantly looking to avoid discipline or morality, then you will become a slave to impulsive desires and be easily manipulated. To be so wishy washy as to go along and do whatever the desires demand is actually making oneself a slave, which the book shows is quite sad and pitiable.
At some point, perhaps I will give a review of Dune. I can see why it is a science fiction classic while also raising serious questions and critiques that feel prescient today.
2.
“For we will all stand before the judgment seat of God. For it is written, ‘As I live, says the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall εχομολογησεται (exomologesetai) to God.”‘
– St. Paul of Tarsus in Romans 14:10-11
Exomologeo can be translated as “to openly and joyfully profess, to announce with glee, to profess without reservation.”
Rarely do I hear people quote beyond Romans 8, but the later chapters of Paul’s letter to the church in Rome have some really interesting things to say.
I always felt as though this passage challenged the majority of conventional Western Christianity. Most people, when I tell them about this passage, either did not know it was in the Bible at all or were unaware that it is often translated in an unfavorable way.
Go ahead, read Romans 14:10-11 for yourself in whatever English translation you so choose.
Let me know what you find.
3.
“Contemplation is a sudden gift of awareness, an awakening to the Real within all that is real.”
– Thomas Merton, Trappist Monk
The Gospel of John is my favorite Gospel.
And, not just for the obvious reason that we share a name!
I believe the NT scholar Raymond Brown was correct when he asked if John’s Gospel is more symbolic and cryptic than the other three. It just has so much meaning and symbolism packed into it that it is not intentional.
In college, one of my professors said that one of the keys to reading John’s Gospel is the healing of the blind man. If you pay attention throughout the Gospel, you will see a commentary on those with spiritual sight and those with spiritual blindness.
In fact, what the West calls “spiritual blindness” might be relatively close to what the East calls “illusion.”
In the life of faith, I have most enjoyed and been changed by those “eureka!” moments. You know, those moments when something shifts, and you see something that you have always seen in a completely new way. If that has ever happened to you, then you know that it feels like a blindfold has been taken off, and you can see something clearly.
In Christianity, this is known as “contemplation.” Contemplatio is the Latin word the early church used for prayer.
I do not know about you, but it certainly feels to me like modern society is more interested in keeping us entertained and shopping rather than gaining spiritual sight and seeing the deeper Reality before us.
4.
“What are kingdoms without justice? They’re just gangs of bandits.”
– St. Augustine of Hippo in The City of God
Christianity is absolutely interested in Justice.
It truly boggles my mind that some people do not believe this is the case.
There is not much worse than a Christianity that excuses and then goes so far as to say that injustice is not worth fighting against with every fiber within.
Without Justice, according to St. Augustine, we are just “gangs of bandits.”
That sounds very much like the Wild West, if you ask me.
5.
“Sin has not a particle of substance. It is ‘no-thing,’ and can only be known through the pain that it causes.”
– Julian of Norwich in The Showings of Divine Love
The older I get, the more I think about vices and virtues.
The world has enough vices, and I really don’t need to contribute to that side of the fence. What the world needs is for you and me to both contribute to the virtues.
That said, I kind of understand how both conservatives and liberals lament how sin is understood today.
Sure, the conservative side seems to highlight or prioritize individual sins and to emphasize that we are each accountable for our own actions. Meanwhile, the progressive side seems to highlight or prioritize corporate sins committed by entire groups of people. In a very real sense, both individual and corporate sins wreck the world.
But into all of this also comes the wisdom of Julian of Norwich.
We know a sin is a sin because of the pain it causes. Sometimes we don’t know what is going on in the moment, but in the aftershock of it all, it becomes apparent.
Julian seems intent on saying that sin is not a thing; it has no ontological basis or existence. It is not a “thing” like a table or a chair, or an uncle, whose existence depends on God. Rather, sin is “no-thing.” It is a vacuum, said some of the early desert monastics. Sin is the absence of goodness, of healing, of truth.
We know an act is good because it protects and mends, just as we know a sin is a sin because it creates victims and fractures what was once whole.
Actually, the Apostle Paul said something poignant about this…
“Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore, love is the fulfillment of the law.” – (Romans 13:10)
I guess from this we can also say that if a “love” causes “harm” then it actually isn’t the fulfillment of the law?
Who knows? I am likely rambling at this point. The longer I type, the less articulate I feel.
Goodness, I am still figuring out what love is myself… so who am I to talk?
But… at least I have a decent grasp on what defines sin from Julian of Norwich.








